Did you miss The Wheat Series Part 1: Wheat and the Immune System? Read it HERE.
Did you miss The Wheat Series Part 2: Opening the Barrier to Poor Gut Health? Read it HERE.
Did you miss The Wheat Series Part 3: Setting Off the Bacterial Alarms – With or Without the Bacteria Read it HERE.
Nothing is scarier than someone invading your home. You’re nearly asleep when you hear the sound of something rustling downstairs. Instantly you’re awake and your internal alarm bells go off. You grab the phone. Fortunately the police are nearby and arrive almost instantly. They’ll catch the invader. You have nothing left to fear. Or do you?
The police enter the darkened house to a confusing scene. Your teenage son, sneaking home from the party you told him not to go to, has stumbled into the unknown invader. Meanwhile, your partner has entered the other side of the room carrying a baseball bat. The police can just make out three figures in the dark. Several seem armed and one may be a hostage. An officer draws her gun, but who does she point it at?
Sadly, it’s not always a happy ending. Innocent people are killed in their own homes all too often.
While a home invasion is something most of us will hopefully never experience, dealing with invaders is something our bodies have to handle thousands of times each day. And just like a thief entering your house, it would seem the job of identifying the invader – bacteria and viruses – should be a simple task. But it’s not.
The immune system – the police of our bodies – has to deal with equally dark and confusing scenarios as it tries to differentiate dangerous invaders from our own cells, beneficial microflora, and food.1-3
Fortunately, it has evolved remarkably complex systems that make it very good at determining which is which.
One food however is even better at breaking in, turning out the lights, and making the police point the gun in the wrong direction. Wheat.
In Parts 1, 2, and 3 of this series on wheat, we talked about how wheat affects the three things that can cause the digestive immune system to dysfunction. The first was increased permeability (Part 2), the second was excess bacterial stress (Part 3). The third is the subject of this post – harmful dietary antigens.
ANTIGENS – IDENTIFYING THE INVADER
Antigens are critically important to our immune defenses. In fact, without them, most of our immune system wouldn’t be able to function. Which begs the question – what exactly are antigens?
They are just molecules. And not really any special type of molecule. Antigens exist in everything – bacteria, viruses, our food, even our own cells. As long as our immune cells can bind to it and identify it, it’s an antigen.4
Certain cells in our immune system, called antigen presenting cells (APCs), travel around our bodies “sampling” everything they encounter. They aren’t particular – they’re just as likely to check out our own cells as a foreign bacterium. They chew everything they sample into small molecules and present these antigens to the brains of our immune system – T Cells.4
T Cells are trained from birth not to respond to our own unique self-antigens which makes them remarkably good at identifying anything foreign. Together, T Cells and APCs determine when an antigen isn’t self and more importantly if it’s something to be worried about.5
Think of an antigen as an ID card. APCs and T Cells are the police hunting through the house for anyone who doesn’t belong. The more hot-headed APC likes to slam anyone it encounter up against the wall and takes their ID. It’s the T Cell who looks over their identification and decides if they belong or not. It’s the misfit buddy cop movie of our bodies.
The problem is, just like in the movies, ID cards are easy to fake. Some viruses have evolved the ability to mimic our own antigens in an attempt evade detection.6, 7
And like your daughter’s boyfriend who tends to sneak through the window at night, not everything from outside is bad (though some fathers reading this may be thinking “shoot him.”) Beneficial bacteria in our gut are foreign, but we’ve learned to live in synergy with them.2, 3, 8 Likewise, all food is technically foreign, but an immune response to we eat would lead to debilitating allergic reactions and worse.9-11
To deal with this extra level of complexity, our immune systems have developed two sophisticated “interogation” techniques – co-stimulation and oral tolerance.
CO-STIMULATION (OR THE SECOND SIGNAL)
Just identifying an antigen as foreign actually isn’t enough for a T Cell to start an immune response. The T Cell must also receive an activating signal from the APC as it presents the antigen. The APC gives this second signal when it has been exposed to a large amount of the antigen or if the body is in an inflamed state.5, 12-15
It’s the equivalent of the T Cell asking the APC “I don’t recognize this guy, should I draw my gun?” Surprisingly, the tough guy APC generally replies “What this wimp? Nah I can take him.”
This is a fancy term for not reacting to food. A special type of APC, called dendritic cells (DCs), specializes in reaching into the gut to sample food particles and microflora. Most of the time it presents the antigens with the message: “This is food. Don’t do anything.”1, 12, 14 DCs work in conjunction with a special T cell called T Regulatory (Treg) cells that respond to self-antigens instead of foreigners. But unlike other T cells, when activated, Tregs supress the immune system.12, 16-18
These two cells are the police movie equivalent of the by-the-books pencil-pushers who constantly tells the loose cannon to holster his gun. Fortunately, in our bodies, the pencil-pushers are in control most of the time.17
The image below shows the antigen identification system in action. Plasma cells, macrophages and DCs are all APCs. As you can see, in the healthy gut, Tregs dominate.19
WHEAT: THE MASTER CRIMINAL
For the rest of this post we’ll talk about how wheat is essentially a “master criminal” able to flip our antigen identification system on its head. But unlike a virus, wheat doesn’t break the system to try to evade detection. Instead it intentionally sets of the alarms and provokes the immune system to draw its guns. Tragically it’s also very good at getting immune cells to fire on the wrong target.20
THE LOCK PICKING PICKPOCKET
Part 2 of this series explained how wheat effectively opens the tight junctions of our gut allowing bacteria, large molecules and gliadin from wheat itself to enter the body.21-24
But that’s not the only way wheat breaks in.
A protein in wheat called Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) is very good at binding to the cells in our digestive tract and passing right through them into our blood stream.13, 25, 26 WGA can also bind other particles. So not only can it gain entry into circulation, but it can carry antigens from the gut with it.27, 28
THE POLICE PROVOKER
Above, we discussed how the immune system doesn’t automatically respond to foreign antigens. It first needs a co-stimulation before drawing its guns. We also covered the two things that cause APCs to provide this second signal.
The first was exposure to a large quantity of antigens. By “picking the locks” to the house, wheat essentially flings open the doors allowing a huge flow of antigens from the gut into the body.
The second thing that gets APCs to provide the co-stimulation is inflammation. In Part 3 of this series, I explained how wheat tricks the body into believing it is under perpetual bacterial stress.29-33 This creates a constant inflammatory state that causes the once suppressive DCs to flip and start activating the immune system.34, 35 Other APCs follow suite.30, 32, 36-39
In other words, the once tolerant “pencil-pusher” cops of the immune system become gun happy in a way that would make Arnold Schwarzenegger cringe.13
In short, wheat ensures there’s a co-stimulation. Wheat also breaks tolerance:
WGA is able to enter the body bypassing all the mechanisms of oral tolerance.25, 28 So, the first time WGA and the food antigens bound to it are exposed to the immune system is in circulation where the response is almost always inflammatory.
Worse, in multiple studies of wheat’s effect on mice and humans, wheat reduced the levels of Treg (the immune-suppressors) in favor of a type of T Cell called Th17.29, 34, 40 We’ll explore this shift in greater detail in Part 5. All you need to know for now is Th17 is the loose cannon cop who shoots first, asks questions later.41-43
THE RED HERRING
This is the definition of an autoimmune disease. It is a condition where the immune system identifies self-antigens as foreign and attacks its own body.44 In other words, the police accidently shoot the residents.
One popular theory of how autoimmune disease comes about is the viral mimicry theory. A virus enters the body that mimics self-antigens.14 In the process of fighting the virus, the immune system ends up identifying the mimicked self-antigens as foreign.6, 7, 45
For this to happen, the body has to be in an inflamed state. That way APCs provide the co-stimulation required and they also suppress Treg cells which would otherwise prevent a reaction to self. This is why the theorists looked at viruses. Not only would they mimic self-antigens, they’d also create the necessary inflammation.7, 45
However, we’ve just seen that wheat does an equally good job of providing the co-stimulation and shutting down Treg’s. And wheat may provide the mimicry as well, so forget the virus.20, 44, 46-48
Of the over 100 autoimmune conditions identified, the trigger has been discovered for only a handful. One of those is celiac disease. In this condition, gliadin from wheat binds a protein in the body called tissue transglutaminase (tTG). The immune system reacts to tTG-gliadin antigens causing it to attack the digestive tract.39, 49, 50
Gliadin may also cross-react with neural components of the brain and contribute to conditions like multiple sclerosis, gluten ataxia, and autism.46, 47, 51 Similarly, WGA is able to bind to many different cells once inside the body.20, 26, 31 While responding to WGA, the immune system will sometimes also react to its binding tissues.20, 52
What all of this amounts to is the ending to that home invasion story none of us want to hear. Wheat and the police end up in a tense standoff and guns are drawn. Tragically your son gets mistaken for one of the invaders and gets killed in the cross-fire.
Fortunately, while wheat can dysregulate the immune system in all of us, not everyone who eats it develops an autoimmune disease. In the final part of this series we’ll talk about how genetic susceptibility is required for disease.
Read The Wheat Series Part 5: Pulling the Trigger on a Loaded Chamber HERE
du Pre, M.F. and J.N. Samsom, Adaptive T-cell responses regulating oral tolerance to protein antigen. Allergy, 2011. 66(4): p. 478-90.
McFall-Ngai, M., Adaptive immunity: care for the community. Nature, 2007. 445(7124): p. 153.
Ohnmacht, C., et al., Intestinal microbiota, evolution of the immune system and the bad reputation of pro-inflammatory immunity. Cell Microbiol, 2011. 13(5): p. 653-9.
Murphy, K., et al., Janeway’s immunobiology. 8th ed. 2012, New York: Garland Science. xix, 868 p.
Lenschow, D.J., T.L. Walunas, and J.A. Bluestone, CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu Rev Immunol, 1996. 14: p. 233-58.
Oldstone, M.B.A., Molecular mimicry and immune-mediated diseases. Faseb Journal, 1998. 12(13): p. 1255-1265.
Wucherpfennig, K.W. and J.L. Strominger, MOLECULAR MIMICRY IN T-CELL-MEDIATED AUTOIMMUNITY – VIRAL PEPTIDES ACTIVATE HUMAN T-CELL CLONES SPECIFIC FOR MYELIN BASIC-PROTEIN. Cell, 1995. 80(5): p. 695-705.
Smith, P.D., et al.,Intestinal macrophages and response to microbial encroachment. Mucosal Immunol, 2011. 4 (1): p. 31-42.
Ahmed, T., et al., Immune response to food antigens: kinetics of food-specific antibodies in the normal population. Acta Paediatr Jpn, 1997. 39(3): p. 322-8.
Seibold, F., Food-induced immune responses as origin of bowel disease? Digestion, 2005. 71(4): p. 251-260.
Ganeshan, K., et al., Impairing oral tolerance promotes allergy and anaphylaxis: A new murine food allergy model. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2009. 123(1): p. 231-238.
Williamson, E., G.M. Westrich, and J.L. Viney, Modulating dendritic cells to optimize mucosal immunization protocols. J Immunol, 1999. 163(7): p. 3668-75.
de Aizpurua, H.J. and G.J. Russell-Jones, Oral vaccination. Identification of classes of proteins that provoke an immune response upon oral feeding. J Exp Med, 1988. 167(2): p. 440-51.
Stepniak, D. and F. Koning, Celiac disease–sandwiched between innate and adaptive immunity. Hum Immunol, 2006. 67(6): p. 460-8.
Scalapino, K.J. and D.I. Daikh, CTLA-4: a key regulatory point in the control of autoimmune disease. Immunol Rev, 2008. 223: p. 143-55.
Battaglia, M., et al., IL-10-producing T regulatory type 1 cells and oral tolerance. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2004. 1029: p. 142-53.
Wing, K. and S. Sakaguchi, Regulatory T cells exert checks and balances on self tolerance and autoimmunity. Nat Immunol, 2010. 11(1): p. 7-13.
Veldman, C., A. Nagel, and M. Hertl, Type I regulatory T cells in autoimmunity and inflammatory diseases. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 2006. 140(2): p. 174-183.
Macdonald, T.T. and G. Monteleone, Immunity, inflammation, and allergy in the gut. Science, 2005. 307(5717): p. 1920-5.
Vojdani, A., Lectins, agglutinins, and their roles in autoimmune reactivities. Altern Ther Health Med, 2015. 21 Suppl 1: p. 46-51.
Drago, S., et al., Gliadin, zonulin and gut permeability: Effects on celiac and non-celiac intestinal mucosa and intestinal cell lines. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2006. 41(4): p. 408-19.
Fasano, A., Physiological, Pathological, and Therapeutic Implications of Zonulin-Mediated Intestinal Barrier Modulation Living Life on the Edge of the Wall. American Journal of Pathology, 2008. 173(5): p. 1243-1252.
Fasano, A., Surprises from celiac disease. Sci Am, 2009. 301(2): p. 54-61.
Lammers, K.M., et al., Gliadin induces an increase in intestinal permeability and zonulin release by binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR3. Gastroenterology, 2008. 135(1): p. 194-204 e3.
Lavelle, E.C., et al., Mucosal immunogenicity of plant lectins in mice. Immunology, 2000. 99(1): p. 30-7.
Pusztai, A., et al., Antinutritive effects of wheat-germ agglutinin and other N-acetylglucosamine-specific lectins. Br J Nutr, 1993. 70(1): p. 313-21.
Ertl, B., et al., Lectin-mediated bioadhesion: preparation, stability and caco-2 binding of wheat germ agglutinin-functionalized Poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-microspheres. J Drug Target, 2000. 8(3): p. 173-84.
Gabor, F., M. Stangl, and M. Wirth, Lectin-mediated bioadhesion: binding characteristics of plant lectins on the enterocyte-like cell lines Caco-2, HT-29 and HCT-8. J Control Release, 1998. 55(2-3): p. 131-42.
Antvorskov, J.C., et al., Dietary gluten alters the balance of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in T cells of BALB/c mice. Immunology, 2013. 138(1): p. 23-33.
Bernardo, D., et al., Is gliadin really safe for non-coeliac individuals? Production of interleukin 15 in biopsy culture from non-coeliac individuals challenged with gliadin peptides. Gut, 2007. 56(6): p. 889-890.
Dalla Pellegrina, C., et al., Effects of wheat germ agglutinin on human gastrointestinal epithelium: insights from an experimental model of immune/epithelial cell interaction. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2009. 237(2): p. 146-53.
Jelinkova, L., et al., Gliadin stimulates human monocytes to production of IL-8 and TNF-alpha through a mechanism involving NF-kappaB. FEBS Lett, 2004. 571(1-3): p. 81-5.
Junker, Y., et al., Wheat amylase trypsin inhibitors drive intestinal inflammation via activation of toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med, 2012. 209(13): p. 2395-408.
Palova-Jelinkova, L., et al., Gliadin fragments induce phenotypic and functional maturation of human dendritic cells. J Immunol, 2005. 175(10): p. 7038-45.
Nikulina, M., et al., Wheat gluten causes dendritic cell maturation and chemokine secretion. J Immunol, 2004. 173(3): p. 1925-33.
Harris, K.M., A. Fasano, and D.L. Mann, Monocytes differentiated with IL-15 support Th17 and Th1 responses to wheat gliadin: implications for celiac disease. Clin Immunol, 2010. 135(3): p. 430-9.
Palova-Jelinkova, L., et al., Pepsin digest of wheat gliadin fraction increases production of IL-1beta via TLR4/MyD88/TRIF/MAPK/NF-kappaB signaling pathway and an NLRP3 inflammasome activation. PLoS One, 2013. 8(4): p. e62426.
Thomas, K.E., et al., Gliadin stimulation of murine macrophage inflammatory gene expression and intestinal permeability are MyD88-dependent: role of the innate immune response in Celiac disease. J Immunol, 2006. 176(4): p. 2512-21.
Tuckova, L., et al., Activation of macrophages by gliadin fragments: isolation and characterization of active peptide. J Leukoc Biol, 2002. 71(4): p. 625-31.
Ejsing-Duun, M., et al., Dietary gluten reduces the number of intestinal regulatory T cells in mice. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 2008. 67(6): p. 553-559.
Langrish, C.L., et al., IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation. J Exp Med, 2005. 201(2): p. 233-40.
Evans, H.G., et al., In vivo activated monocytes from the site of inflammation in humans specifically promote Th17 responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009. 106(15): p. 6232-7.
Mesquita Jr, D., et al., Autoimmune diseases in the TH17 era. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2009. 42(6): p. 476-86.
Sollid, L.M. and B. Jabri, Triggers and drivers of autoimmunity: lessons from coeliac disease. Nat Rev Immunol, 2013. 13(4): p. 294-302.
Oldstone, M.B.A., MOLECULAR MIMICRY AND AUTOIMMUNE-DISEASE. Cell, 1987. 50(6): p. 819-820.
Hadjivassiliou, M., et al., Autoantibody targeting of brain and intestinal transglutaminase in gluten ataxia. Neurology, 2006. 66(3): p. 373-7.
Vojdani, A., et al., Immune response to dietary proteins, gliadin and cerebellar peptides in children with autism. Nutr Neurosci, 2004. 7(3): p. 151-61.
Alaedini, A., et al., Immune cross-reactivity in celiac disease: anti-gliadin antibodies bind to neuronal synapsin I. J Immunol, 2007. 178(10): p. 6590-5.
Dieterich, W., et al., Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease. Nature Medicine, 1997. 3(7): p. 797-801.
Molberg, O., et al., Tissue transglutaminase selectively modifies gliadin peptides that are recognized by gut-derived T cells in celiac disease. Nature Medicine, 1998. 4(6): p. 713-717.
Vojdani, A., D. Kharrazian, and P.S. Mukherjee, The prevalence of antibodies against wheat and milk proteins in blood donors and their contribution to neuroimmune reactivities. Nutrients, 2014. 6(1): p. 15-36.
Falth-Magnusson, K. and K.E. Magnusson, Elevated levels of serum antibodies to the lectin wheat germ agglutinin in celiac children lend support to the gluten-lectin theory of celiac disease. Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 1995. 6(2): p. 98-102.